Article Data

  • Views 528
  • Dowloads 158

Original Research

Open Access

Retrospective evaluation of occlusal adaptation of stainless steel crowns applied under deep sedation

  • Akif Demirel1
  • Nur S Önder2
  • Tuğba Bezgin1
  • Merve H Kocaoğlu1
  • Çağıl Vural3,*,
  • Şaziye Sarı1

1Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey

2Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Başkent University, 06490 Ankara, Turkey

3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2025.005 Vol.49,Issue 1,January 2025 pp.60-66

Submitted: 16 January 2024 Accepted: 18 June 2024

Published: 03 January 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Çağıl Vural E-mail: vuralc@ankara.edu.tr

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to retrospectively assess the occlusal adaptation, marginal adaptation, and other clinical pathologies of stainless steel crowns (SSCs) performed under deep sedation. Methods: Patients who received SSCs under deep sedation between January 2022 and January 2023 and underwent clinical follow-ups, along with photographic/radiographic evaluations if available, at the 1st week, 1st, 3rd and 6th months, were planned to be included in the study. Furthermore, patients were included in the study if they were evaluated for marginal adaptation of SSC, occlusal adaptation of SSC, fracture or decementation of SSC, abscess/fistula formation, and sensitivity to palpation or percussion during clinical follow-ups. These findings were recorded retrospectively. Accordingly, 24 patients who met the specified criteria were included in this study. The data was analysed with Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test (significance level was set at 0.05). Results: In the first week, successful occlusal adaptation (SOC) was observed in 83.33% (n = 20) of the cases. Also, no other clinical failures or marginal inadaptibility were found in any patient. In the marginal adaptation and clinical success, there was no statistical difference between the examination periods in terms of the number of successful cases (p = 1.000), while the successful cases in the occlusal adaptation evaluation in the first week was statistically lower than those who were successful in further examination periods (p = 0.046). Conclusions: Within its limitations, this study demonstrated that the occlusal adaptation of SSCs placed under deep sedation was acceptable even in the immediate postoperative period. The results are thought to be influenced by the adaptive masticatory system of children. Therefore, it was suggested that acceptable occlusal harmony could be achieved by referencing the adjacent and opposing teeth during SSC placement. Nonetheless, further clinical studies are required to validate these findings.


Keywords

Deep sedation; Marginal adaptation; Occlusal adaptation; Stainless steel crown


Cite and Share

Akif Demirel,Nur S Önder,Tuğba Bezgin,Merve H Kocaoğlu,Çağıl Vural,Şaziye Sarı. Retrospective evaluation of occlusal adaptation of stainless steel crowns applied under deep sedation. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025. 49(1);60-66.

References

[1] Coté CJ, Wilson S; American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics. 2019; 143: e20191000.

[2] Porritt J, Marshman Z, Rodd HD. Understanding children’s dental anxiety and psychological approaches to its reduction. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2012; 22: 397–405.

[3] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Chicago, Ill. 2023; 359–377.

[4] Vural Ç, Kocaoğlu MH, Akbarihamed R, Demirel A. A retrospective investigation of patient- and procedure-related factors associated with cardiorespiratory complications in pediatric dental patients undergoing deep sedation. Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 45: 511–519.

[5] Hugar S, Kohli N, Soneta S, Saxena N, Kadam K, Gokhale N. Psychological behavior management techniques to alleviate dental fear and anxiety in 4–14-year-old children in pediatric dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dental Research Journal. 2022; 19: 47.

[6] Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, de Oliveira LJC, Conde MCM, Demarco FF, et al. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2018; 28: 123–139.

[7] Rodrigues JA, Casagrande L, Araújo FB, Lenzi TL, Mariath AAS. Restorative materials in pediatric dentistry. In Leal SC, Takeshita EM (eds.) Pediatric restorative dentistry (pp. 161–167). 1st edn. Springer International Publishing: Switzerland. 2019.

[8] Ludovichetti FS, Stellini E, Signoriello AG, DI Fiore A, Gracco A, Mazzoleni S. Zirconia vs. stainless steel pediatric crowns: a literature review. Minerva Dental and Oral Science. 2021; 70: 112–118.

[9] Seale NS, Randall R. The use of stainless steel crowns: a systematic literature review. Pediatric Dentistry. 2015; 37: 145–160.

[10] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatric restorative dentistry. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Chicago, Ill. 2023; 443–456.

[11] Schüler IM, Hiller M, Roloff T, Kühnisch J, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Clinical success of stainless steel crowns placed under general anaesthesia in primary molars: an observational follow up study. Journal of Dentistry. 2014; 42: 1396–1403.

[12] Clark L, Wells MH, Harris EF, Lou J. Comparison of amount of primary tooth reduction required for anterior and posterior zirconia and stainless steel crowns. Pediatric Dentistry. 2016; 38: 42–46.

[13] Chen K, Lei Q, Xiong H, Chen Y, Luo W, Liang Y. A 2-year clinical evaluation of stainless steel crowns and composite resin restorations in primary molars under general anaesthesia in China’s Guangdong province. British Dental Journal. 2018; 225: 49–52.

[14] Munoz-Sanchez ML, Linas N, Decerle N, Collado V, Faulks D, Nicolas E, et al. Radiological evaluation of stainless steel crowns placed on permanent teeth in patients treated under general anaesthesia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 2509.

[15] Patel RV, Thikkurissy S, Schwartz SB, Gosnell ES, Sun Q, Cully JL. Preferential use of stainless steel crowns as a strategy to minimize retreatment of primary molars under general anesthesia. Pediatric Dentistry. 2021; 43: 24–27.

[16] Innes N, Evans D, Hall N. The hall technique for managing carious primary molars. Dental Update. 2009; 36: 472–478.

[17] Altoukhi DH, El-Housseiny AA. Hall technique for carious primary molars: a review of the literature. Dentistry Journal. 2020; 8: 11.

[18] Joseph RM, Rao AP, Srikant N, Karuna Y, Nayak AP. Evaluation of changes in the occlusion and occlusal vertical dimension in children following the placement of preformed metal crowns using the hall technique. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2020; 44: 130–134.

[19] von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The BMJ. 2007; 335: 806–808.

[20] Kopczynski K, Meyer BD. Examining parental treatment decisions within a contemporary pediatric dentistry private practice. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2021; 15: 645–652.

[21] Kaptan A, Korkmaz E. Evaluation of success of stainless steel crowns placed using the hall technique in children with high caries risk: a randomized clinical trial. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2021; 24: 425–434.

[22] Seale NS. The use of stainless steel crowns. Pediatric Dentistry. 2002; 24: 501–505.

[23] Mathew MG, Roopa KB, Soni AJ, Khan MM, Kauser A. Evaluation of clinical success, parental and child satisfaction of stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns in primary molars. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2020; 9: 1418–1423.

[24] Pani SC, Dimashkieh M, Mojaleed F, Al Shammery F. The role of an occlusal template during the placement of preformed metal crowns in children under general anaesthesia: a randomised control trial. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2015; 16: 461–466.

[25] Gallagher S, O’Connell BC, O’Connell AC. Assessment of occlusion after placement of stainless steel crowns in children—a pilot study. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2014; 41: 730–736.

[26] Alshareef AA, Alkhuriaf A, Pani SC. An evaluation of bite pattern in children with severe-early childhood caries before and after complete dental rehabilitation. Pediatric Dentistry. 2017; 39: 455–459.

[27] van der Zee V, van Amerongen WE. Short communication: influence of preformed metal crowns (Hall technique) on the occlusal vertical dimension in the primary dentition. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2010; 11: 225–227.

[28] Innes NP, Stirrups DR, Evans DJ, Hall N, Leggate M. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice—a retrospective analysis. British Dental Journal. 2006; 200: 451–454.

[29] Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR. The Hall Technique; a randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months. BMC Oral Health. 2007; 7: 18.

[30] Kindelan SA, Day P, Nichol R, Willmott N, Fayle SA; British society of paediatric dentistry. UK national clinical guidelines in paediatric dentistry: stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2008; 18: 20–28.

[31] Ghadimi S, Seraj B, Ostadalipour A, Askari E. Comparison of canine overlap in pediatric patients requiring stainless steel crown placement under general anesthesia before and after the procedure. Frontiers in Dentistry. 2019; 16: 78–87.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top