Article Data

  • Views 177
  • Dowloads 124

Original Research

Open Access

Long-term recurrence-free survival of orthodontic treatments for Class II malocclusion as the important supplement protocol to adenotonsillectomy in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a case-control retrospective study

  • Tian Xia1
  • Ruqian Luo1
  • Mengxing Wan1,*,

1Department of Stomatology, Children’s Hospital affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, 100020 Beijing, China

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2025.037 Vol.49,Issue 2,March 2025 pp.178-187

Submitted: 23 March 2024 Accepted: 20 June 2024

Published: 03 March 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Mengxing Wan E-mail: summer861202@163.com

Abstract

Background: To estimate the long-term recurrence-free-survival of three orthodontic treatments in the management of residual obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) after adenotonsillectomy in children combined with Class II malocclusion taking conventional positive airway pressure (PAP) as control. Methods: A retrospective case-control cohort study, enrolled pediatric OSAS with Class II after adenotonsillectomy. The records of the patients were divided into a rapid maxillary expansion (RME), mandibular advancement appliances (MAA) and myofunctional therapy (MFT) group based on the therapy they received. Control group comprised patients used PAP at the same admission time. The primary endpoint was a long-term recurrence-free-survival. Secondary outcomes measures included the immediate post-operative success rate, improvements in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores, craniofacial changes, s-electromyogram (s-EMG) changes of masticatory muscle and long-term OSAS sequelae. Results: A total of 1217 cases were analyzed. The estimated 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free rate was 81.9%, 70.8% and 56.4% in PAP vs. 86.2%, 81.0% and 77.5% in RME vs. 85.5%, 78.0%and 74.7% in MAA vs. 83.0%, 74.9% and 58.3% in MFT, respectively. Significantly greater median of recurrence-free-survival was observed in RME, MAA and MFT group as opposed to PAP-control group (122.04 ± 3.04 (95% CI (confidence interval): 116.08, 127.99), 20.04 ± 4.21 (95% CI: 111.79, 128.28), 68.96 ± 4.95 (95% CI: 59.24, 78.68) vs. 54.96 ± 2.51 (95% CI: 50.05, 59.87)). The post-treatment ESS scores, craniofacial variables, s-EMG parameters greatly improved at post-treatment from the baseline value and sustained during long-term follow-up. No severe complications were observed. Conclusions: As opposed to conventional PAP, a better long-term RFS (recurrence free survival) was associated with the therapeutic trial using RME and MAAs, which provided a reasonable alternative for residual OSAS after adenotonsillectomy in children combined with Class II malocclusion. Their benefits appeared especially in children due to poor compliance to conventional PAP.


Keywords

Residual obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; Class II malocclusion; Positive airway pressure; Rapid maxillary expansion; Mandibular advancement appliances; Myofunctional therapy


Cite and Share

Tian Xia,Ruqian Luo,Mengxing Wan. Long-term recurrence-free survival of orthodontic treatments for Class II malocclusion as the important supplement protocol to adenotonsillectomy in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a case-control retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025. 49(2);178-187.

References

[1] Perez C. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children. General Dentistry. 2018; 66: 46–50.

[2] Savini S, Ciorba A, Bianchini C, Stomeo F, Corazzi V, Vicini C, et al. Assessment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in children: an update. ACTA Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2019; 39: 289–297.

[3] Chan KC, Au CT, Hui LL, Wing YK, Li AM. Childhood OSA is an independent determinant of blood pressure in adulthood: longitudinal follow-up study. Thorax. 2020; 75: 422–431.

[4] Xiao L, Su S, Liang J, Jiang Y, Shu Y, Ding L. Analysis of the risk factors associated with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in Chinese children. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2022; 10: 900216.

[5] Gulotta G, Iannella G, Vicini C, Polimeni A, Greco A, de Vincentiis M, et al. Risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children: state of the art. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16: 3235.

[6] Xu Q, Wang X, Li N, Wang Y, Xu X, Guo J. Craniofacial and upper airway morphological characteristics associated with the presence and severity of obstructive sleep apnea in Chinese children. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2023; 11: 1124610.

[7] Garg RK, Afifi AM, Garland CB, Sanchez R, Mount DL. Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: consensus, controversy, and craniofacial considerations. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2017; 140: 987–997.

[8] Ramar K, Dort LC, Katz SG, Lettieri CJ, Harrod CG, Thomas SM, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and snoring with oral appliance therapy: an update for 2015. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2015; 11: 773–827.

[9] Bariani R, Guimaraes TM, Cappellette MJ, Moreira G, Fujita RR. The impact of positive airway pressure on midface growth: a literature review. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2020; 86: 647–653.

[10] Templier L, Rossi C, Miguez M, Perez JC, Curto A, Albaladejo A, et al. Combined surgical and orthodontic treatments in children with OSA: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9: 2387.

[11] Yu M, Ma Y, Xu Y, Bai J, Lu Y, Han F, et al. Orthodontic appliances for the treatment of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2023; 72: 101855.

[12] von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. International Journal of Surgery. 2014; 12: 1495–1499.

[13] Section on Pediatric Pulmonology, Subcommittee on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. American Academy of Pediatrics. Clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and management of childhood obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Pediatrics. 2002; 109: 704–712.

[14] Patinkin ZW, Feinn R, Santos M. Metabolic consequences of obstructive sleep apnea in adolescents with obesity: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Child Obesity. 2017; 13: 102–110.

[15] Rueda JR, Mugueta-Aguinaga I, Vilaro J, Rueda-Etxebarria M. Myofunctional therapy (oropharyngeal exercises) for obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020; 11: CD013449.

[16] Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991; 14: 540–545.

[17] Uniken VJ, Doff M, Joffe-Sokolova D, Wijkstra PJ, van der Hoeven JH, Stegenga B, et al. Long-term obstructive sleep apnea therapy: a 10-year follow-up of mandibular advancement device and continuous positive airway pressure. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2020; 16: 353–359.

[18] Camacho M, Chang ET, Song SA, Abdullatif J, Zaghi S, Pirelli P, et al. Rapid maxillary expansion for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Laryngoscope. 2017; 127: 1712–1719.

[19] Pirelli P, Saponara M, De Rosa C, Fanucci E. Orthodontics and obstructive sleep apnea in children. Medical Clinics of North America. 2010; 94: 517–529.

[20] Tsuda H, Fastlicht S, Almeida FR, Lowe AA. The correlation between craniofacial morphology and sleep-disordered breathing in children in an undergraduate orthodontic clinic. Sleep and Breathing. 2011; 15: 163–171.

[21] Galeotti A, Festa P, Viarani V, D’Anto V, Sitzia E, Piga S, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion in children with obstructive sleep apnoea. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2018; 21: 242–247.

[22] Cohen-Levy J, Quintal MC, Rompre P, Almeida F, Huynh N. Prevalence of malocclusions and oral dysfunctions in children with persistent sleep-disordered breathing after adenotonsillectomy in the long term. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2020; 16: 1357–1368.

[23] Uong EC, Epperson M, Bathon SA, Jeffe DB. Adherence to nasal positive airway pressure therapy among school-aged children and adolescents with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Pediatrics. 2007; 120: e1203–e1211.

[24] Giuca MR, Carli E, Lardani L, Pasini M, Miceli M, Fambrini E. Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: emerging evidence and treatment approach. The Scientific World Journal. 2021; 2021: 5591251.

[25] Sanchez-Sucar AM, Sanchez-Sucar FB, Almerich-Silla JM, Paredes-Gallardo V, Montiel-Company JM, Garcia-Sanz V, et al. Effect of rapid maxillary expansion on sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome in growing patients. A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2019; 11: e759–e767.

[26] Yanyan M, Min Y, Xuemei G. Mandibular advancement appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine. 2019; 60: 145–151.

[27] Gambino F, Zammuto MM, Virzi A, Conti G, Bonsignore MR. Treatment options in obstructive sleep apnea. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2022; 17: 971–978.

[28] Koletsi D, Makou M, Pandis N. Effect of orthodontic management and orofacial muscle training protocols on the correction of myofunctional and myoskeletal problems in developing dentition. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2018; 21: 202–215.

[29] Farronato G, Giannini L, Galbiati G, Maspero C. Sagittal and vertical effects of rapid maxillary expansion in Class I, II, and III occlusions. The Angle Orthodontist. 2011; 81: 298–303.

[30] Boyd SB, Walters AS, Waite P, Harding SM, Song Y. Long-term effectiveness and safety of maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2015; 11: 699–708.

[31] Araie T, Okuno K, Ono MH, Sakai T. Dental and skeletal changes associated with long-term oral appliance use for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2018; 41: 161–172.

[32] Bjork A, Skieller V. Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. British Journal of Orthodontics. 1977; 4: 53–64.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top